Akadigma
Journal of Sciences
A double-blind peer-reviewed, open-access journal for original interdisciplinary research, with an emphasis on the social sciences.
About the Journal
The Akadigma Journal of Sciences is an international, peer-reviewed and open-access journal publishing original research across disciplines, with an emphasis on the social sciences.
The journal supports work that makes a theoretical contribution, states its method plainly and opens its findings to debate. Interdisciplinary work is particularly encouraged.
Two issues appear each year, in Turkish and in English. Every submission goes through double-blind peer review; under the journal's open-access policy all content is published free of charge and no fee is requested from authors.
Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026)
11 articles published in this issue
JUNE 2026
June 2026
- Research Article The transformation of performance discourse in public institutions: a discourse analysis, 2000–2025 Ayşe YILMAZ, Cem ÖZTÜRK Pages 1–2410.XXXXX/akd.2026.001AbstractPDF
- Research Article The hidden costs of flexible work: a qualitative study of white-collar employees Özlem TUNÇ, Kemal ER Pages 25–4810.XXXXX/akd.2026.002AbstractPDF
- Review Article Methodological debate in critical management studies: where do we stand? Selin POLAT Pages 49–7010.XXXXX/akd.2026.003AbstractPDF
Archive
8 issues · 72 articlesAll published issues. Everything is open access, reachable at a permanent address and available for harvesting by indexes.
2026
2025
2024
2023
Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026)
15 June 2026JUNE 2026
Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026)
Table of Contents
In page order- Research Article The transformation of performance discourse in public institutions: a discourse analysis, 2000–2025 Ayşe YILMAZ, Cem ÖZTÜRK 1–2410.XXXXX/akd.2026.001AbstractPDF
- Research Article The hidden costs of flexible work: a qualitative study of white-collar employees Özlem TUNÇ, Kemal ER 25–4810.XXXXX/akd.2026.002AbstractPDF
- Review Article Methodological debate in critical management studies: where do we stand? Selin POLAT 49–7010.XXXXX/akd.2026.003AbstractPDF
- Research Article A critique of organisational silence Nazlı ACAR 71–9410.XXXXX/akd.2026.004AbstractPDF
- Research Article Neoliberal governance and university management: a case study Fatma KAYA 95–12010.XXXXX/akd.2026.005AbstractPDF
- Research Article Corporate rituals and everyday practices of resistance Gülce ASLAN, Mert KURT 121–14610.XXXXX/akd.2026.006AbstractPDF
- Book Review A Critical History of Management Thought: a review Barış DEMİRTAŞ 147–15410.XXXXX/akd.2026.007PDF
The transformation of performance discourse in public institutions: a discourse analysis, 2000–2025
Kamu kurumlarında performans söyleminin dönüşümü: 2000–2025 arası bir söylem analizi
Abstract
This study examines how the discourse of performance management in Turkish public institutions was transformed between 2000 and 2025. Critical discourse analysis was applied to a corpus of institutional documents, strategic plans and activity reports.
The study discusses the tensions this shift produced in the understanding of public service, and argues that performance measurement ceased to be a technical instrument and became a means of producing institutional legitimacy.
Türkçe Öz
Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de kamu kurumlarında performans yönetimi söyleminin 2000–2025 arasında nasıl dönüştüğünü incelemektedir. Kurumsal belgeler, stratejik planlar ve faaliyet raporlarından oluşan bir külliyat üzerinde eleştirel söylem analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, performans kavramının başlangıçta hesap verebilirlikle ilişkilendirilirken zamanla verimlilik ve rekabet vurgusuna kaydığını gösteriyor.
Çalışma, bu kaymanın kamu hizmeti anlayışında yarattığı gerilimleri tartışıyor ve performans ölçümünün teknik bir araç olmaktan çıkıp kurumsal meşruiyet üretme aracına dönüştüğü savını ileri sürüyor.
Extended Summary
Performance measurement in public administration entered the Turkish policy agenda in the early 2000s as an extension of accountability debates. This study traces how that agenda shifted over twenty-five years, following the concepts institutions used to define performance in their own documents.
The corpus consists of 214 strategic plans and activity reports published between 2000 and 2025 by twelve ministries and their affiliated bodies. Texts were first coded by year and institution, then the co-occurrence patterns of performance, efficiency, accountability and competition were extracted.
The findings suggest three distinguishable periods: an early period in which accountability dominates, a middle period in which the discourse of efficiency strengthens, and a final period in which the measurement practice itself becomes a source of legitimacy. In the last period, indicators turn from the quality of the service into the way an institution narrates itself.
The study argues that the place of performance measurement in public administration needs rethinking, and that designing indicators together with service areas could limit this shift.
Declarations
- Research and Publication Ethics Statement
- Scientific and ethical principles were followed in preparing this study, and all works drawn on are cited in the references.
- Ethics Committee Statement
- This study does not fall within the scope of research requiring ethics committee approval.
- Author Contribution Statement
- The authors contributed equally to the study.
- Conflict of Interest Statement
- The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Support and Funding Statement
- This study received no institutional funding.
- AI Use Statement
- An AI-assisted writing tool was used for language checking; the content, analysis and interpretation are the authors' own.
- Acknowledgements
- The authors thank the archive units of the institutions concerned for their help with access to documents.
References 12
- Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2012). Making sense of management: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
- Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.
- Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
- Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
- Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Addison-Wesley.
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
- Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement. Georgetown University Press.
- Sözen, S. (2012). Türkiye'de kamu yönetimi reformları ve performans esaslı bütçeleme. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(2), 1–26.
- Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Other Articles in This Issue
Whole issueForms
Forms and templates that authors, reviewers and readers may need. Download a form, fill it in and upload it at the relevant step of the process.
Author Forms
Reviewer Forms
Copyright and Ethics Forms
About
Aims and Scope
The Akadigma Journal of Sciences is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal publishing original research across disciplines, with an emphasis on the social sciences. Its purpose is to provide an institutional space for sound scholarship published in the open.
The journal considers work in the following areas:
- Sociology, political science and public administration
- Business, management and organisation studies
- Educational sciences and education policy
- Communication, culture and media studies
- Qualitative, quantitative and mixed research methods
Language of Publication
The journal accepts articles in Turkish and English. Whatever the language of the article, every paper carries a title, abstract and keywords in both languages.
Publication Frequency
Two issues are published each year, in June and December. Special issues appear outside this schedule and are announced separately.
Journal History
The journal began publication in 2023. There has been no change of title or ISSN since.
Journal Policies
Open Access and Copyright
The journal holds that the free circulation of knowledge accelerates scholarship. All content becomes freely available the moment it is published, with no embargo period. No charge is made to authors at any stage.
Articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 licence. Copyright remains with the authors; the journal exercises only the right of first publication.
Peer Review Process
Every submission first passes an editorial check. Manuscripts found suitable in scope and form are sent to at least two reviewers. The process is double-blind: authors do not see reviewer identities and reviewers do not see author identities.
Where two reviewers disagree, a third opinion is sought or the editor decides. Referee reports are retained for at least five years after publication.
Publication Ethics
The journal follows the principles of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). The responsibilities of authors, reviewers and editors are defined under separate headings.
Where a study requires ethics committee approval, the document is requested at submission; the board name, date and reference number are stated in the article.
Plagiarism Policy
A similarity report is required for every submission. The similarity ratio, excluding references, is expected to remain below 20%. In suspected cases, COPE flowcharts are applied.
Article Charges
The journal charges no fee at submission, review or publication. There is no subscription or pay-per-article for readers either.
Archiving Policy
All published content is retained permanently on the journal's own server and registered with a DOI. It is also open to harvesting through the OAI-PMH protocol.
For Authors
Style Guide
Manuscripts are prepared on A4 pages in 12-point Times New Roman with 1.5 line spacing and 2.5 cm margins on all sides. The text is justified.
Length
- Research article: 6,000–9,000 words including references
- Review article: 5,000–8,000 words
- Book review: 1,500–2,500 words
Abstract and Keywords
Turkish and English abstracts of 150–250 words must state the purpose, method, findings and conclusion of the study. Three to five keywords are given in each language. English-language articles include a Turkish extended abstract of up to 600 words. The limits are checked on the submission screen with a live word counter.
References
The journal follows APA 7th edition. In-text citations take the form (Author, year, page). Where a DOI exists it is written as a full address.
Files Required at Submission
- Main text (blinded, containing no author information)
- Title page (title, authors, ORCID, affiliations, contact details)
- Similarity report
- Ethics committee approval where the study requires it
- Copyright transfer and conflict of interest declaration
Declarations
The submission screen asks for these statements as separate fields: Research and Publication Ethics, Author Contribution, Conflict of Interest, Support and Funding, AI Use, and Acknowledgements. The ethics committee question must also be answered; when approval is not required, the standard sentence is filled in automatically. The statements appear under the same headings on the article page and in the printed version.
Editorial Board
Affiliations are stated openly, as index criteria requireEditor-in-Chief
Section Editors
4 members · 4 institutionsAdvisory Board
9 members · 7 institutions · 3 countriesGet in Touch
Share your comments, suggestions and questions by filling in the form below. We will get back to you as soon as we can.